Ralph W. Hammett, Ann Arbor’s Monuments Man (Ann Arbor Observer)

Hammett Article-A2 Observer-Feb 2014

This article appeared in the Ann Arbor Observer, February 2014, p. 22 & 24.


Ralph W. Hammett, Ann Arbor’s Monuments Man: full article

1 11 14 final in pdf


JXN’s cuterebra: a parasite misses its mark

This article appeared in the Ann Arbor Observer, July 2013.


Click for Ann Arbor, Michigan Forecast

Monday December 30, 2013
Follow us: facebook twitter RSS feed
JXN the cat, Ann Arbor, 2013

JXN’S Cuterebra

A parasite misses its mark.

by Margaret Leary

posted 7/18/2013



Patient information: Name: JXN. Species: Feline. Sex: MN. Breed: DSH. Birthday: 7/26/2011. Age: 1 year old. Color: Grey. Weight: 10 lbs. 12 oz.

Presenting concerns: fever.

History: Still febrile, ate once after home yesterday-new today, small scab on neck.

Physical exam findings: Scab is over breathing hole, not yet erupted, of small cuterebra. Removal after anesthesia/�capstar, removed 7 mm grub, flush out poorly defined multichambered pocket over trachea. Red swollen area of tissue approx. 2.5 cm wide, hole after removal small, approx. 6 mm.

Assessment: Grub is a normal rabbit parasite. Does not mature to fly in a cat. Makes cat very sick before the grub dies. He will be 100% better as toxins leave his body. Hole will close up without any more treatment.

This report from the Ann Arbor Animal Hospital tells a lot about a type of cat parasite that was new to me, even after sixty years of cat ownership. But there’s more. So here’s the backstory.

“I’m way overinvolved emotionally with this cat, and I don’t think he’s going to make it to his first birthday next week,” I told veterinarian Jessica Franklin at the AAAH on a hot day in late July. “He’s been lethargic for two days, the antibiotics he got here yesterday didn’t make any difference, he won’t eat or drink, and he has this little scab on his neck that isn’t near big enough to make him sick.” I started to cry.

We got JXN shortly after Thanksgiving 2011-when Luke, our oldest cat, suddenly died. We chose a new feline-the smartest, handsomest, and most curious of all the kittens at the Ann Arbor Cat Clinic. We named him Jackson, and decided to spell it JXN for ease of texting (us, or him?). JXN is a beautiful cat, close to a Russian Blue: long legs, big ears, and huge eyes whose pupils are often enlarged by his close attention to every moving thing. We had JXN neutered, got all the right shots and tests,

…continued below…

and brought him home.

From day one, he was a delight, learning to climb on our fake holiday tree as he systematically removed each ornament, loving anyone who came to the house, and performing acrobatic, aerobatic leaps at his Cat Dancer toy. In spring he went outdoors and learned that real trees aren’t so sturdy as steel ones. He fell about twenty feet but recuperated after an extended pee of relief. He had other scrapes, getting stuck on the roof and in other trees, and finding out about skunks, but by midsummer he was maturing and having fewer scary episodes. I remained concerned, however, about his habit of exploring every new thing, whether animal, vegetable, or mineral, by licking and nibbling.

And now this inexplicable, possibly incurable, fevered stupor.

“Your cat came in here yesterday with a fever of undetermined origin,” Franklin told me. Then she broke into what seemed an inappropriate smile of joy. “But I know what’s wrong. You found it. And I can fix it right now! Your cat chased a rabbit into its hole.”


JXN had a “cuterebra grub” which is toxic to cats, Franklin said, but once it’s removed an adult cat will quickly recover. JXN’s fever and accompanying slightly elevated white blood cell count were his immune system’s response to the grub’s toxins.

Half an hour later, I was taking a woozy JXN home. He had a shaved spot on his neck, and the hole was a bit larger where Franklin had used tiny tweezers to gently remove the entire grub.

A bit of research on the Michigan Department of Natural Resources website helped me understand that JXN was the victim of Cuterebra horripilum. After a pair of botflies’ summer mating, gravid females deposit eggs, usually along runways or at entrances to the host animal’s burrow. C. horripilum tends to seek out the throat region in cottontail rabbits (or overly curious marauding cats). JXN probably picked his up chasing a rabbit into its lair.

The eggs hatch into larvae in response to a sudden increase in temperature-we certainly had that last July-and the moist environment of the host. The larvae enter the host by way of a natural body opening, commonly the nose or mouth (that licking habit), or a minute abrasion of the skin. They frequently remain in oral and nasal passages several days before worming and eating their way to preferred locations under the skin. Eventually the cuterebra pushes out of its breathing hole, falls to the ground, and pupates into another fly.

Cuterebra horripilum do not usually kill a healthy adult cat, although secondary infections might. The cuterebra can seriously compromise a kitten or young rabbit, though, because their weak immune systems allow the grub to grow quickly.

Staff at the Ann Arbor Animal Hospital told me that JXN was only their second cuterebra victim last summer, but in other years cuterebra cases have been numerous. All cat owners know about such parasites as fleas and worms, but who knew about cuterebras? Now I have my own specimen, safely stoppered up in a tube of alcohol.

Most important, JXN is completely back to his energetic, overly curious self. And I see that my deep attachment to him is driven by my preference to focus on his youth, not my own age, and on his need for me now that, in retirement, I have few other responsibilities.

There he goes, leaping off the deck to chase a squirrel up a tree. I hope he doesn’t get to the nest.    (end of article)

[Originally published in July, 2013.]

On July 18, 2013, Fran wrote:

It’s great to let people know about rare causes of sicknesses in pets like this, but everything could have easily been avoided if he was an indoor only cat. Especially since he explores with his mouth, there are lots of toxic plants and animals out there. After all, the average outdoor cat only lives 2-5 years, while the average indoor cat lives 17.

Keep your cats healthy and keep them inside!

On July 21, 2013, Margaret Leary wrote:

I appreciate your comment, and know about the statistics. This is a choice all cat owners have to make, and the decision may vary from cat to cat. Our cats have all lived over 10 years and like the outdoors so much we don’t want them to be cut off from it. I trust you to make the best decision for your pets!

On October 12, 2013, wrote: My daughter had one of these this month. Turns out children can also be

Action Postponed on New Retail Development


Action Postponed on New Retail Development

Planning commissioners raise concerns over plan for The Shoppes at 3600 on Plymouth; also, off-street parking ordinance change in works


November 11, 2012 at 9 am

Ann Arbor planning commission meeting (Nov. 7, 2012): Planning commissioners took a range of actions at their most recent meeting, and said farewell to one member.

The Shoppes at 3600 Plymouth, retail, Ann Arbor planning commission, The Ann Arbor Chronicle

Aerial view of a proposed retail development on Plymouth Road west of US-23 – The Shoppes at 3600. The site is in the complex where the Holiday Inn North Campus is located, visible on the right side of this image. This document was included in the planning commission’s Nov. 7 meeting packet.

Citing concerns over placement of the building on the site, commissioners postponed making a recommendation for a proposed retail development at 3600 Plymouth Road, immediately west of US-23. Called The Shoppes at 3600, the building is oriented with its back facing Plymouth. Commissioner Bonnie Bona, acknowledging the difficulty of positioning the building on this parcel, suggested that “perhaps this development is not right for this site.”

Also during the meeting, the commission continued the city’s ongoing annexation of township property by recommending the annexation of a Pittsfield Township parcel at 2503 Victoria, east of Packard Road. The recommendation includes zoning it for single-family residential (R1C) – a house is already under construction there.

An amendment to the city’s off-street parking ordinance was also recommended for approval. The change would allow more flexibility for temporary off-street parking for special events, such as hockey games at Michigan Stadium. Planning manager Wendy Rampson noted that there was not as much urgency to this amendment now, in light of the recent cancellation of the NHL’s Winter Classic at Michigan Stadium.

The commission also passed a resolution retroactively enabling three commissioners to attend the Michigan Association of Planning’s annual meeting, held on Oct. 17-19. The action enables commissioners to be reimbursed for their expenses.

The meeting closed with remarks of appreciation about and from commissioners Tony Derezinski and Evan Pratt, who are ending their terms. Derezinski, the commission’s representative from Ann Arbor city council, is leaving council after being defeated in the August Ward 2 Democratic primary by Sally Petersen. [Derezinski was subsequently, on Nov. 8, appointed by the council to planning commission as a citizen representative. It’s expected that Sabra Briere (Ward 1) will be joining the commission as the council’s next representative.] Pratt, elected as Washtenaw County water resources commissioner in the Nov. 6 general election, will be required to attend Tuesday evening meetings of the Washtenaw County parks and recreation commission, precluding membership on the planning commission, which also meets on Tuesdays. Pratt has served on the planning commission since 2004.

In the absence of chair Kirk Westphal, vice chair Wendy Woods led the Nov. 7 meeting.

The Shoppes at 3600

On the agenda for consideration was a site plan and rezoning request for a new retail development, The Shoppes at 3600. The site is on the south side of Plymouth Road, immediately west of the entrance ramp onto southbound US-23, in the northeast area of the city.

This matter had been scheduled for discussion at the meeting on Oct. 16, 2012, but the meeting was cancelled for lack of a quorum. The staff report recommended approval of rezoning from R5 (motel-hotel district) to C3 (fringe commercial district), and approval of the site plan, subject to four conditions: (1) approval of a land division, to divide off a 1.15 acre parcel from the parking lot and front yard of the 10.85-acre hotel site where the Holiday Inn North Campus is located; (2) approval of an administrative amendment to the parent site plan to change the parking for the hotel, since some will be removed to allow for the new building; (3) recording an ingress/egress easement along the existing drive from Plymouth Road, so that a new curb cut would not be needed; and (4) recording stormwater and cross-parking easements between the hotel and the new building.

A 9,490-square foot, one-story retail building would be constructed in what’s now the parking lot and front yard for the hotel, at an estimated construction cost of $1 million. The building would have room for several businesses, including a restaurant with a one-lane drive-through window and outdoor seating. An existing shared driveway off of Plymouth Road would be used to access the site. The project includes 33 parking spots and four covered bike parking spots near the entrance. The owner is listed as Ann Arbor Farms Hotel Corp., with property being developed by Diverse Development in Holland, Ohio.

City planner Chris Cheng explained the project and the staff recommendation. Approval of the zoning was recommended because the proposed uses that are permitted under the C3 zoning are consistent with the recommendations of the city’s master plan (land use element) and would be compatible with the city’s adopted plans and policies, as well as with surrounding properties. Staff recommended approval of the site plan because, if the stated conditions are satisfied, it would comply with all local, state and federal laws and regulations; would limit the disturbance of natural features to the minimal necessary for a reasonable use of the land; would not cause a public or private nuisance; and would not have a detrimental effect on public health, safety or welfare.

Cheng’s presentation emphasized that the existing driveway onto the property from Plymouth Road would be sufficient and no new curb cut would be required. He noted that underground detention of water from a 100-year storm was provided, and that parking would be shared with the hotel. One landmark tree would be removed and five mitigation trees would substitute for it.

The site plan proposed a building with three fast food and two retail establishments. There are not yet agreements with any specific franchises, according to Kenneth Hicks, who addressed the commission on behalf of Diverse Development. However, the proposed front elevation drawings providing to the city show a Tim Horton’s, Domino’s Pizza, Chipotle, and a shoe store.

The entrances to the businesses would be on the south side of the building, with a drive-through road along the north, or back, of the building. The drive would be screened from Plymouth Road with trees and shrubs. [.pdf of staff report]

The Shoppes at 3600 – Public Hearing & Commentary

There was one speaker during the public hearing for this item. Warren Attarian of  Ann Arbor said he had been a resident and homeowner in the neighborhood for 40 years, in the Orchard Hills/Maplewood subdivision “It is hard to believe this is consistent with the master plan,” he said. “It puts fast food restaurants at a major, six-lane entry to the city.” In addition, he said, “you are putting the face of the building on the inside, so those coming into the city will see the back of the fast food restaurants.” Concluding, he stated that the city has “control over zoning – you don’t owe anybody anything. My strong opinion is that this type of building would be inappropriate.”

The staff report included a summary of the public meeting held by the developer on Aug. 16, 2012, at the Holiday Inn. Notice of the meeting went to 113 citizens who live within 1,000 feet of the property, and three attended. [The staff report stated that the Orchard Hills/Maplewood neighborhood is beyond 1,000 feet and so those residents did not receive the notice.] Two people at that neighborhood meeting raised concerns about traffic on Plymouth Road, and one said that students and staff at Cleary University, across the street at 3601 Plymouth Road, would appreciate having the restaurants.

Colin Dillon spoke during the opportunity for public commentary at the end of the Nov. 7 planning commission meeting, giving his opinion that the building for The Shoppes at 3600 was “a bit shoe-horned in.” Dillon was among several students from the University of Michigan’s Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning’s master of urban planning program who attended the meeting.

The Shoppes at 3600 – Commission Discussion

Discussion focused on the placement of the building on the site, the color scheme shown in proposal, traffic, and parking.

Commissioner Ken Clein asked whether the colors in the presentation were “accurate.” Kenneth Hicks of Diverse Development replied “no” and apologized for the look of the colors; he said the building would be faced with brick, and that the side toward Plymouth Road would have treatments to make it appear to have storefronts, windows, and awnings, so that “the back will look like the front, using insets.”

Clein said the plan “presents a dilemma. The petitioner is not doing us a favor by not showing how the side we are concerned about will look, so it is hard to embrace it. My sense is that the landscaping will be the better part of the view [from Plymouth Road], no matter how nice the brick is.” Clein also said he’d like to see what’s proposed for signage, to avoid a surprise later on.

Commissioner Diane Giannola asked what the advantage was of the proposed configuration. Hicks replied, “It has to do with your minimum and maximum setbacks. We went down the path of having it well set back [from Plymouth Road], but most communities appreciate having the urban look and feel of not having a sea of asphalt [along Plymouth Road].” Planning Manager Wendy Rampson added, “We did not want the building to face the US-23 on-ramp.”

Commissioner Eric Mahler raised concerns about traffic, asking why the “perceived high number of traffic accidents” cited in the staff report would not be of concern. City planner Chris Cheng responded that the “LOS [level of service] would not get any worse” when the building is done, and that he did not anticipate more accidents because the development would draw from traffic already on the road – it would not attract new traffic. In addition, Cheng said, the developer will put up new signage to highlight that only right turns are allowed coming from the development onto Plymouth Road. Signs would also direct those wanting to head west to the Green Road egress on the west side of the site.

Commission member Bonnie Bona asked a series of questions related to the placement of the building and the difficulty of placing a building on a site with a 45-degree angle on the southeast corner. If placement is so difficult, she pondered, “perhaps this development is not right for this site.” She continued, “If we rezone it, we won’t be able to affect the [appearance of the building’s] elevations. The site requires the building to turn its back to the road. I can’t approve it as it is now, and I struggle with what the right zoning would be.”

Commissioner Tony Derezinski wondered, “Who will the shoppers be?” Hicks replied they would be people from the adjacent park-and-ride on the US-23 cloverleaf, as well as from the hotel, people driving by, and from Cleary University. Derezinski also asked for clarification of the parking arrangement. Cheng said that 51 spaces would be removed to allow the new development, and 33 would be added; the city code allows agreements for two entities to share parking.

Bona then moved to postpone the matter, seconded by Mahler. Bona said she wanted to see more detail about a path between the hotel and the new building. She also wanted to see whether the building could back to the US-23 entrance ramp and have the parking on the west. Finally, she wanted to know whether treating the site as a planned project “due to the difficulty of putting it next to Plymouth Road” would work, running the building from north to south. She sought, she said, a reason to approve the C3 zoning.

Hicks noted that he had been meeting with planning staff since June. To him, the site plan “makes all the sense in the world,” given the way the traffic comes into the site and flows from the hotel. Moving the building doesn’t work, he said, because it would disrupt the hotel’s business. “I don’t know how we can redesign it.” He noted that the site is configured in this way due to drainage from the freeway berm.

Rampson pointed out that the motion to postpone was only about rezoning, not the site plan. Clein said he supported postponing the rezoning and “dealing with both zoning and the site plan when they come back.”

Outcome: The motion to postpone action on rezoning passed unanimously. There was no vote on the site plan, but both items will come back to the commission for consideration at a future meeting.

Annexing Pittsfield Township “Island”

The commission considered a proposal to annex a Pittsfield Township “island” property at 2503 Victoria – on the east side of Victoria Avenue, between Independence Boulevard and Robert Street – into the city and zone it for single-family residential (R1C). The owner, Janet Max, intends to build a single-family home on the 6,628-square-foot parcel. The building is already under construction.

According to a planning staff report, the site is one of a dozen remaining township islands in the area bordered by Washtenaw Avenue, Packard Road, and Platt Road. The staff recommendation was to approve the petition “because the property is within the City’s water and sewer service area, and the proposed R1C zoning is consistent with the adjacent zoning.” A table in the report showed all adjacent property to be R1C. The site is in the Mallets Creek watershed.

The staff report also recognized that the parcel is nonconforming by being slightly too small to meet R1C zoning requirements for lot width and minimum lot area. From the report: “It is considered a lot of record and can be used as a single-family dwelling site…the house meets all R1C setback requirements.”

The owner was allowed to start construction before the annexation and zoning were completed, according to the staff report, because she had paid for connections to city services, and obtained soil erosion and building permits. On Sept. 12, 2012, the director of building services for Pittsfield Township relinquished authority to the city of Ann Arbor to enforce the city’s zoning requirements and review and inspect a proposed dwelling on the parcel.

Annexing Pittsfield Township “Island” – Commission Discussion

Commission discussion was short. Tony Derezinski asked about the unresolved matter concerning the sidewalk extension.  The staff report had listed that as a pending matter: “the sidewalk must be extended across the entire frontage of the parcel.”

Planner Chris Cheng said that a certificate of occupancy would not be issued until the sidewalk is complete.

Outcome: Unanimous approval to recommend the annexation and zoning of 2503 Victoria.

Off-Street Parking

Staff recommended approving proposed amendments to the city code’s Chapter 59, Off Street Parking, section 5:166, to allow temporary parking of motor vehicles in the “front open space” on private property as part of a special event.

Currently, the city’s off-street parking ordinance bans parking in the “front open space” of private property. If vehicles aren’t parked in a legal parking lot or driveway, they could be ticketed.

The staff report noted that “over the past few years, a number of special events have been scheduled at Michigan Stadium that have drawn large crowds.” Planning manager Wendy Rampson observed wryly that “the pressure to make this amendment is off, since the Winter Classic [ice hockey] game won’t happen this year.” The National Hockey League event, between the Detroit Red Wings and the Toronto Maple Leafs, had been scheduled for Jan. 1, 2013 at Michigan Stadium. It was canceled earlier this month due to ongoing labor disputes between the NHL and its players’ association.

The staff report stated that parking demand for these special events is similar to that generated by home football games, yet there is no provision for allowing parking in the front open space, which means that vehicles so parked may be ticketed. Currently, Chapter 59 includes an exception that allows parking in the front open space of football game days and by permit during the Ann Arbor street art fair. “The proposed amendment…would allow city council to set ‘special event dates’ for temporary front open space parking to address parking demand” for special events. [.pdf of proposed amendment]

Off-Street Parking – Commission Discussion

Eric Mahler moved the resolution and Tony Derezinski seconded it. Ken Clein asked, “Is the intent that a series of dates would be considered by council in advance, to make it easier for people to know when the parking was allowed?”

Wendy Rampson replied, “It could be done as an annual resolution to include art fairs, a marathon, and other events. Council knows about these because they get resolutions for other necessities such as special traffic control.”

Outcome: The resolution recommending that city council amend the ordinance passed unanimously.

Conference Reimbursement

The last action item was a resolution, required by the planning commission’s bylaws, to enable commission members Bonnie Bona, Ken Clein, and Evan Pratt to attend the annual meeting of the Michigan Association of Planning (MAP), which happened on Oct. 17-19, 2012 at Grand Traverse Resort. Bona reminded her colleagues that the bylaw requirement of approval was to make sure such expenditures were “really needed.”

The approval means that the commissioners can be reimbursed for roughly $600 each to cover registration ($325 each) and lodging expenses ($273 each for two nights at Grand Traverse Resort). According to planning manager Wendy Rampson, the city’s planning unit has a conference and training budget of $8,000 for the current fiscal year. That funding is intended to cover training for planning staff, planning commissioners and zoning board of appeals members. In addition, the historic district commission has a separate conference and training budget of $200. If necessary, budget funds can be shifted from planning to historic preservation.

Outcome: Approval to attend MAP passed unanimously.

Misc. Communications

During each meeting, commissioners and staff have several opportunities for announcements or other communications.

At the Nov. 7 meeting, communications included notice of two meetings of the North Main task force, which will next meet on Nov. 28; a second meeting of a sub-group of that task force, the 721 N. Main project; the need for the commission’s ordinance review committee to have more time to make recommendations about R4C zoning changes; and the public art commission’s interest in helping with the South State Street corridor recommendations, such as including art in the Ellsworth Road roundabout.

Near the end of the meeting, Tony Derezinski gave a special welcome to students from the University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning’s master of urban planning program who attended the meeting. Derezinski  said “We love to have people come and see us and hope they don’t fall asleep.” He added that urban development is really coming back strong, and the city is giving a lot of attention to its transportation corridors, with Re-imagining Washtenaw, the Plymouth corridor, State Street, and North Main.

Bonnie Bona congratulated Evan Pratt on his recent election as Washtenaw County water resource commissioner, and said to Derezinski “This may be your last meeting as council representative, and thank you for that service.” Derezinski replied that “I’ve been on council four years – it was a great experience, and the best part was being on planning commission. We don’t always agree, but as with all good public bodies, we learn to disagree agreeably. These days that is unusual: for strong-minded people to come to agreement.” [On Nov. 8, 2012, city council appointed Derezinski to planning commission as a citizen representative.]

Pratt added that this would be his last meeting on the planning commission, because as water resources commissioner, he has a statutory obligation to be at meetings of the Washtenaw County parks and recreation commission on Tuesday evenings – the same night that planning commission meetings are held.

The meeting closed with a round of applause.

Present: Commission members Bonnie Bona, Ken Clein, Tony Derezinski, Diane Giannola, Eric A. Mahler, Evan Pratt, and Wendy Woods. Staff members: Planner Chris Cheng and planning manager Wendy Rampson.

Absent: Eleanore Adenekan, Kirk Westphal.

Next regular meeting: Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2012 at 7 p.m. in the second-floor council chambers at city hall, 301 E. Huron St., Ann Arbor. [Check Chronicle event listings to confirm date]

County Pursues Major New Parks & Rec Deal


County Pursues Major New Parks & Rec Deal

Purchase could create new state recreation area in southwest Washtenaw; several other acquisitions approved; update on Ypsilanti rec center


November 19, 2012 at 9 am

Washtenaw County Parks & Recreation Commission meeting (Nov. 13, 2012): At their November meeting, county parks & recreation commissioners approved moving forward with a major project that could result in a new state recreation area in the southwest corner of Washtenaw County.

Trolz property, Manchester Township, Washtenaw County parks & recreation commission, The Ann Arbor Chronicle

Sign on the Trolz property in Manchester Township, which might become part of a new state recreation area in southwest Washtenaw County. (Photo by Russ Serbay.)

The proposal is to partner with the Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources to acquire a total of 2,160 acres straddling the border of Jackson and Washtenaw counties – the Trolz property. The area includes an abandoned rail right-of-way that could become a multipurpose trail.

The county parks system would purchase about 461 acres of that total area – a parcel located in Manchester Township and appraised at $1.37 million. The commission authorized staff to conduct additional work on the potential deal, with a final proposal and request for approval in the coming months.

The commission also received an update on the proposed East County Recreation Center from Craig Borum, professor at the University of Michigan’s Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning. Borum presented two options for laying out the entire 38-acre Water Street redevelopment area in Ypsilanti, where the rec center would be located. He also reviewed two possible draft designs for the recreation building on a portion of the site.

The commission kept up its pace of land preservation efforts, often in partnership with other organizations. It gave final approval to acquire conservation easements on the 124-acre Drake property in Lodi Township, in partnership with the Ann Arbor greenbelt program. Final approvals were also given for easements on the 73-acre Hornback property in Salem Township, partnering with the greenbelt and Salem Township; and for the 213-acre Bailo property in Superior Township. In addition, the commission authorized preparation of a purchase offer for 65 acres in Superior Township – the Ford Road property – at a price of $500,000, contingent on completion of all due diligence and the commission’s final approval. When completed, WCPARC’s contribution to all these deals would total $900,224 to preserve 475 acres.

The nine-member commission will face some turnover in 2013. At the end of the meeting, commissioner Jimmie Maggard announced his intent to resign after 24 years of serving on WCPARC. Barbara Bergman, who serves on WCPARC because of her position as a county commissioner, did not seek re-election and will be leaving the county board at the end of 2012. The same is true for Janis Bobrin, who did not seek re-election as the county’s water resources commissioner. She’ll be replaced by Evan Pratt, who won the seat in the Nov. 6 election. Bergman expressed the hope that Bobrin would be appointed to a vacancy on WCPARC – those appointments are made by the county board.

Trolz Property Acquisition

Bob Marans, the commission’s president, introduced a proposal to acquire about 461 acres in Manchester Township, an opportunity for partnership with the Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources to create a much larger new state recreation area at the headwaters of the Raisin River. He said the state’s new emphasis on place-making means the DNR is not just looking at areas “way out in nowhere,” but rather is looking for land with possibilities for recreation and wildlife preservation closer to populated areas.

The concept is, Marans said, that WCPARC and DNR would purchase all of the 2,160 acres remaining in what was originally the 3,500-acre Trolz estate. Tom Freeman, retired deputy director of WCPARC who now serves as a consultant, made a presentation to supplement a written recommendation by director Bob Tetens. Freeman explained that the proposal was for WCPARC to buy the 461 acres in Washtenaw County, using primarily funds from the county’s natural areas preservation program. The county would purchase the bulk of those acres with NAPP money, then use recreation funds to buy an abandoned rail track that runs through the entire property, which could become a multi-use trail to serve pedestrian, cyclists, and the equestrian community.

Freeman said it would be “fabulous kayaking and a fine migratory bird area.” The property includes a building that is ¼-mile long and could be used as part of an equestrian center, he said. According to the staff report, the property includes a “significantly diverse landscape,” with woodlots, wetlands and open fields. As part of the headlands for the River Raisin, the property is crossed by several small streams with a “rolling topography.” An appraisal prepared on behalf of the DNR found the 461 acres to be worth $1,374,295 – or $2,981 per acre. [.pdf of details for Trolz property appraisal] [.pdf map of Trolz property]

Trolz Property Acquisition: Commission Discussion

Commissioner Jan Anschuetz asked about the funding, saying: “We have specific ways to use NAPP, but we don’t have that with rec money. How are we going to sort it out?”

Watkins home on the Trolz property, Washtenaw County parks & recreation commission, The Ann Arbor Chronicle

A view of the Watkins home on the Trolz property. (Photo by Russ Serbay.)

Bob Tetens replied that WCPARC would use parks & recreation funds for land to connect the natural areas – that is, to purchase the 36.53 acres that are in the rail corridor. Tom Freeman pointed out that the land in Jackson County includes Watkins Lake. Asked about the lake’s depth, Freeman reported that it’s no more than 8-10 feet deep. That prompted commissioner Fred Veigel to ask whether it would hold fish in the winter. Yes, Freeman said. Tetens then interposed: “The only thing they [MDNR] are not interested in is hunting.”

Freeman noted that the property in Jackson County includes historic structures, such as the Watkins home, which was part of the Underground Railroad – a recent article in Michigan History magazine featured this property, he said. There were exclamations over a slide of a brick Italianate house.

“Don’t get too excited,” Tetens joked, reminding the group “we’re not taking any action tonight” on the actual purchase.

Commissioner Janis Bobrin asked about the property’s operation or management. Freeman replied that a majority of the responsibility would be the state’s. Anschuetz asked what the DNR plans to do with the buildings. Freeman responded, “as a historic property, the farm house would stay.” He added that “the property is so large that Watkins had his own train stop.”

Freeman also pointed out that the property is very close to the Leonard Preserve, the largest NAPP area, just northwest of the village of Manchester.

Tetens added, “We need to take a trip out there. It is breathtaking. If I won the lotto, I would buy it all.”

Outcome: Unanimous approval of the motion to authorize WCPARC staff to initiate the necessary due diligence examination of the Washtenaw County portion of the Trolz property, including preparation of a survey, environmental site assessment, and if justified, a sales offer, contingent upon development of an acceptable participation agreement with the Michigan DNR. All items subject to review and final approval by the WCPARC

East County Recreation Center

About a year ago, the county parks & recreation commission announced plans to explore a possible new recreation center for the eastern side of Washtenaw County. The 12-acre site is located within Ypsilanti’s Water Street area, on the south side of Michigan Avenue just east of downtown and next to the Huron River.

At WCPARC’s Nov. 13 meeting, director Bob Tetens began the discussion by reviewing the project’s background, including a letter of intent signed earlier this year with the city of Ypsilanti for WCPARC to carry out preliminary planning. The concept is that Washtenaw County would pay for the building, while Ypsilanti would donate the land and the Ann Arbor YMCA would operate the facility. Tetens further explained that the design team, WCPARC staff and YMCA president Cathi Duchon had visited several rec building around the state to get ideas. [See Chronicle coverage: “More Planning for Rec Center in Ypsilanti.” Information about the project is also posted on the county’s parks and recreation website and on the PLY Architecture site.]

Tetens introduced Craig Borum, a professor of architecture at the University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning (TCAUP), who is leading the preliminary design work. Borum used slides and models to illustrate his description of the work that a team of TCAUP faculty and students have done over the last six months to develop both a site plan for the entire 38-acre Water Street redevelopment area, and a design for a recreation center building. The presentation was essentially the same as the Sept. 27, 2012 public forum at SPARK East in Ypsilanti. [See Chronicle coverage: “Public Gives Input on East County Rec Center“]

Borum’s presentation focused on the main qualities of the proposal: that it aimed to provided sustainable urban design; that the rec center would become a catalyst for other development; and that the project would “promote environmental consciousness even after the [rec] building is finished.” The project also is intended to highlight the significance of both the Huron River, which runs along the west side of the site, and of Michigan Avenue, on the north side of the site.

Borum pointed out that the Water Street site was the same size – 38 acres – as all the rest of downtown Ypsilanti, to underline the importance of continuing the sense that you are still in the city when you are on the east side of the Michigan Avenue bridge over the Huron River.

East County Recreation Center: Site Plans, Building Design

Borum presented two possible ways to organize the whole Water Street site: (1) Jeffersonian squares creating a grid, similar to the existing grid in downtown Ypsilanti, of about 12 blocks; or (2) long narrow “French” lots – or ribbons – that would run between the Huron River and Michigan Avenue. The grid scheme would have commercial uses along Michigan Avenue, transitioning to residential uses on the south side, where the Huron River bends to create the southern border of the site. The ribbon scheme creates an extension of River Street as a boulevard connecting Michigan Avenue to the Huron River. Both approaches are urban and emphasize both the river and the canopy of trees that will eventually develop on the site.

Model of a conceptual design for a new recreation center in downtown Ypsilanti

Model of a conceptual “canopy” design for a proposed new recreation center near downtown Ypsilanti. It was one of two models displayed at a Sept. 27 open house to get feedback on the proposed project.

Borum tagged the two possible designs for the recreation building itself as the “storefront” and the “canopy.” The “storefront” would be narrow and long, presenting its face on Michigan Avenue almost like the downtown buildings west of the river and running along the river. The exterior of the building would be “frit glass,” which Borum explained was glass embedded with ceramic bits that could create whatever image the owner desired. His slides showed the glass “fritted” to resemble the façades of a few typical downtown Ypsilanti buildings.

The “canopy” building design had a completely clear glass exterior, so that “you would feel you were under the canopy in a park,” Borum said. Both designs had similar amounts of space devoted to the several activities in the rec building: a reception desk, running track, exercise and meeting rooms, a two-part indoor pool with cool-water lanes for lap-swimmers, and a warm-water pool with a graded entry area suitable for children and those who need assistance such as a walker or chair.

East County Recreation Center: Commission Discussion

Commission member Jan Anschuetz commented that the use of glass for natural interior illumination was similar to the architectural style of early Ypsilanti buildings. She specifically cited the Woodruff School, which was built before there was electricity. Borum replied that the interior sketches in his presentation showed the spaces as they would be when lit by natural light.

Anschuetz commented on the “canopy” design by saying that “this one is very unpopular – people feel it is ugly.” She was referring to comments she had seen on Facebook. She noted that many people in Ypsilanti have spent a lot of money restoring their houses, and even have restored city hall. “We have to be sensitive about why people live in Ypsilanti,” Anschuetz said. “We want to have a rec center, but you have to be very careful with this. People don’t like this one [the canopy design] at all. Many neighborhood groups are strongly opposed.”

WCPARC commission chair Bob Marans responded by saying that the UM team led by Borum is not designing the building – these are conceptual ideas. “Once we get the funding, we will hire someone to design it,” he said. Anschuetz repeated her objections to the “canopy” design, concluding, “The strength of our community is in restoration.” Borum noted that feedback from the public presentation in September showed that the canopy design was ahead with perhaps 80% of the votes that were submitted by the public. WCPARC planner Meghan Bonfiglio spoke in agreement.

Commission member Fred Veigel asked whether Borum had considered translucent panels on the roof. Borum said he had, but that “the payoff on solar is long, about 30 years now. It will get better down the road. The 30-year payback includes the cost of equipment and installation.”

Anschuetz asked Tetens why the project contemplated having the Ann Arbor YMCA operate the facility. Tetens answered that WCPARC can’t afford to both build and operate it, because at the start there will not be a lot of members. He added that the Y has decades of experience running an urban rec center.

Commissioner Barbara Bergman asked for confirmation that the Y was “willing to take the financial risk.” Yes, Tetens replied. Bergman than inquired, “How is the [Ypsilanti] city government responding to this?” Tetens said there is some concern, but the Water Street property – which is owned by the city – hasn’t been on the tax rolls for years. The site also is in the floodplain, and “the valuable property is at the corner of Michigan and River Street” – not where the rec center would be located.

Tetens then segued into a related matter: How the Border-to-Border Trail (B2B) would cross Michigan Avenue. He said he had just gotten word that WCPARC’s application for funding from the Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources had scored very high, “so we are likely to get it.”

Discussion closed with Anschuetz’ comment that the September rec center presentation was “wonderful.” There had been standing room only, she said. Borum promised to provide booklets on the presentation to commission members, and Tetens said the Ypsilanti city council would get briefed in November or December. “We have until July 2013 to come to agreement,” he said, based on terms outlined in the letter of intent with the city of Ypsilanti.

Outcome: This was an item for discussion only, with no vote required.

Conservation Easements

During their Nov. 13 meeting, commissioners approved several new conservation easements that will protect land through the county’s natural areas preservation program (NAPP). A conservation easement is a legally enforceable agreement – between a landowner and a government agency or a land trust – for the purpose of conservation. The purchase of development rights (PDR) is a common mechanism for protecting undeveloped land by letting owners keep their property for farming or other specified uses but preventing its development. Development is prevented through a conservation easement.

WCPARC contracts with the nonprofit Legacy Land Conservancy (LLC) for work on conservation easements like the ones discussed during the November meeting. Susan Lackey, the conservancy’s executive director, and Robin Burke, the LLC land protection coordinator, were on hand to brief commissioners about these deals. Commissioners also were provided written reports prepared by WCPARC director Bob Tetens.

Conservation Easements: Bailo Property

The seven parcels in this deal – owned by the Bailo family – are located in Salem Township, covering 213 acres on the north and south sides of Six Mile Road between Dixboro Road and Pontiac Trail. [.pdf map of Bailo property] According to Tetens’ written report, the acquisition of development rights by WCPARC “would compensate the landowner for the cost of development rights, would establish an agricultural conservation agreement between the landowner and WCPARC to keep the land in agriculture in perpetuity, and would maintain the private ownership of the land.” An appraisal by Bosserd Appraisal Services identified a value of development rights of approximately $430,000. To facilitate this purchase of development rights, the report continued, WCPARC had received a grant of $203,840 from the federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program (FRPP).

Lackey noted that the property has been in the Bailo family for 80 years. It’s a valuable parcel because of the woodland (with a harness track in the middle) that is relatively intact, with a wetland that drains into the river. Burke showed photos taken from walking through the property, including a 60-acre pumpkin field. She described “high quality woods on the north side, with a vernal pond where there is habitat opportunity for salamanders, toads, and turtles.”

Lackey reported that the phase one environmental survey revealed “nothing scary.” Salem Township, she said, “would contribute paperwork worth $2,000.” That comment brought a simultaneous response from Janis Bobrin and Barbara Bergman: “Is that all?” Tetens added that Salem Township had done the application for FRPP funding, and “as time goes on, that participation will grow.”

Commissioner Jimmie Maggard asked whether WCPARC would own this land. Lackey explained that the county would hold a conservation easement, so that the land is protected and can’t be built on. However, the property would be owned by the private landowner, who will continue to pay taxes. She noted that it’s part of a farmland protection program adopted by the county board of commissioners in May 2010.

Maggard responded that “it seems funny we would put in two to three hundred thousand dollars and the land will just sit there.” Bergman pushed back: “There is a legacy for the citizens in the future. We are buying beauty.” Bobrin joined in: “The commissioners and the community place a value on knowing that farming will continue. Without this, the incentive to sell for development is a danger.”

Commissioner Fred Veigel raised a different concern, asking “Is it too late to get a separate appraisal, from another group?“ Lackey responded, “This appraisal was done for the county. I was surprised at how low it was for this location. I had expected it to be twice that.” Bergman added, “This is the time to do it.”

Outcome: The motion to accept the recommendation to authorize final approval to purchase the development rights on the Bailo property at a price of $430,000, with $203,840 to be reimbursed by the FRPP, passed with dissent by Jimmie Maggard.

Conservation Easement: Drake Property

This item had received preliminary approval at the September 2012 WCPARC meeting. The Drake property is 124 acres in Lodi Township on the south side of Waters Road. [.pdf map of Drake property] Preservation of the property is “a high priority for both the Ann Arbor Greenbelt and Lodi Township. A collaborative or partnership approach is proposed,” according to Tetens’ written report. The Ann Arbor greenbelt program would contribute 80% of the price of the conservation easement, or $439,456. WCPARC’s natural areas preservation program would contribute 20%, or $109,864. Lodi Township is contributing $1,000.

The Ann Arbor city council had approved the greenbelt contribution at the council’s Oct. 15, 2012 meeting.

Tom Freeman, former deputy director of WCPARC now serving as a consultant, highlighted that the Drake property is one of the few remaining dairy farms in the county. Of the acres under consideration for the conservation easement, about half are farmed and half are natural. The property contains a high quality woodlot and wetland, and has been “well-managed from a forestry standpoint,” Freeman said. There is a “diversity of trees in age, with a clean understory,” he said.

There was no discussion among commissioners.

Outcome: On a roll call vote, the Drake conservation easement was unanimously approved at $109,864.

Conservation Easement: Hornback Property

This conservation easement would be for 73 acres in Salem Township at the northeast corner of Ann Arbor’s greenbelt, on the east side of Pontiac Trail extending due east and widening to the south to meet Brookville Road, according to Tetens’ written report. The property contains a mature woodlots and wetland areas, with about 30% of the property used for farming. The owners want to retain five acres for a future home site. [.pdf map of Hornback property] WCPARC gave initial approval to this deal at their September 2012 meeting.

Consultant Tom Freeman noted that like the Drake property, the Hornback land was nominated by the Ann Arbor greenbelt for a conservation easement. He was impressed with both the quality of the property and with the partnership being offered: 20% of the cost would come from Salem Township ($64,200), 20% from the county’s NAPP program ($64,200), and 50% from the Ann Arbor greenbelt program ($160,500). The final 10% would come from the property owners, who offer a 10% reduction in the price of the conservation easement.

An appraisal by Williams & Associates put the value of a conservation easement at $321,000, or $4,400 an acre. Mannik & Smith Group did a phase I environmental assessment, and there is a boundary survey including legal description and sealed survey drawing.

Outcome: There was no discussion. A roll call vote was unanimously in support of the recommendation to commit $64,200 toward the purchase of a conservation easement on 73 acres of the Hornback property.

NAPP Acquisition: Ford Road Property

This proposal had been on the agenda for the October meeting, which was cancelled for lack of a quorum. There are three parcels totaling 147 acres in the northeast portion of Superior Township. The proposal before WCPARC was the purchase the northern two parcels – 65 acres – for $500,000. Bosserd Appraisal Services established this value. [.pdf map of Ford Road property]

The property lies north of Ford Road on the east side of Berry Road, just south of Superior Township’s Schroeter Park, which can provide both parking and a trail into the Ford Road land. Tom Freeman presented information about the site, saying that Superior Township has wanted it for some time but is financially unable to acquire it. He pointed to a survey conducted in 1992 by Ellen Weatherbee, who had described the property in glowing terms, noting the high quality of its plant life and stating that it was one of the highest quality pieces of property in the township.

Freeman described the “dramatic contour lines and heavy woods, comprised of red and white oaks, along with a small area of hardwood swamp filled with red maples. A perennial stream cuts through a steeply sloped topography,” part of the River Rouge headwaters.

The county’s natural areas technical advisory committee (NATAC) identified this as a high priority property for acquisition. The relatively high price of $7,692 per acre is due to the property’s proximity to residential development and the Lucas nursery, Freeman explained. This price, he added, is consistent with what NAPP paid for other property in Superior Township: about $8,000 per acre for the J.A. Bloch property on Prospect Road [for the Meyer Preserve], and comparable to the Pellerito property on the southeast corner of Prospect and Cherry Hill Roads.

There was no commission discussion on this item.

Outcome: Unanimous approval to authorize preparation of a purchase offer for the northern portion, 65 acres, of the Ford Road Property LLC at a price of $500,000, contingent upon completion of all necessary due diligence examination of the property and the commission’s final approval.

Rolling Hills Contract Change

WCPARC deputy director Coy Vaughn reported on the Rolling Hills master plan, with the most recent work being on the ring road and trails.

In addition to reporting on completion of phase I, Vaughn asked for approval of change orders to the contract with Dan’s Excavating – for an additional $328,123, or about 10.5% of the original contract for $3.121 million. With the change order, the total contract amount now comes to $3,449,373.

Of the added expenses in the change orders, Vaughn said, 80% were “advancing the capital improvements program.” WCPARC director Bob Tetens added that the biggest changes were in the width of the road, and storm water management. This was, he said, the final change order.

Tetens’ written memo to commissioners listed seven additions to the work and cited several unforeseen unfavorable site conditions, including “multiple areas of heavy clay soils within the storm water management features” and “areas disturbed by Detroit Edison’s crew installing underground electrical service.” The report concluded that “Dan’s will continue to maintain the seeded landscape areas…and are responsible for replacement/repair of deficient items during the warranty period….In general terms, the project is now complete.”

There was no substantive discussion among commissioners on this item.

Outcome: The commission gave unanimous approval to a one-time change order of $328,123, based on the overall work performance of Dan’s Excavating Inc., and their ability to complete the project elements on schedule. The vote also established a final total contract value of $3,449,373 to complete the Rolling Hills Phase I master plan.

Financial Reports

The November meeting included written financial reports covering two months, since WCPARC’s October meeting had been cancelled.

Financial Reports: Claims

The commission received two claims reports: for October and November 2012. In October, a total of $651,872 claims were paid: $647,944 on parks and facilities’ operation and improvements (of which $412,596.24 was for capital improvements primarily at Independence Lake parks); and $3,928 for NAPP acquisition and management. [.pdf of October claims]

In November, a total of $1,890,407 in claims were paid: $1,804,792 on parks and facilities’ operation and improvements (of which $1,266,293 was for capital improvements at the Meri Lou Murray Center, Rolling Hills, and Independence Lake parks); and 400,000 for funding partnerships, primarily for the Border-to-Border Trail in Dexter. [.pdf of November claims]

Outcome: The commission approved payment of claims in the amounts above, which for the two months totaled $2,542,279.

Financial Reports: Fund Balance Statements

Two financial reports were provided – for the months of September and October. Neither required approval, and neither generated comments or questions. [.pdf of fund balance statement through Sept. 30, 2012] [.pdf of fund balance statement through Oct. 31, 2012]

Recreation Reports

WCPARC director Bob Tetens highlighted the increase in rounds at the Pierce Lake golf course, which as of the end of October 2012 were 19,246, up 31% from the previous year’s 14,677, in spite of the heat this year. [The number was up only 7% from 17,926 rounds in 2010]. Revenues for all operations at Pierce Lake were $613,449, up 21% from $508,437 in 2011; but an increase of 17% from $523,869 in 2010.

Tetens also underlined the effect of the warmer-than-usual year on attendance at the Meri Lou Murray Rec Center. In the last three years, 2010 through 2012, attendance was 281,326; 282,669; and 268,978. Revenues for those three years were $977,986; $1,006,356; and $997,406. So even though attendance was 12,348 less in 2012 than in 2010, revenues increased $19,420 from 2010 to 2012.

Independence Lake County Park gate attendance (and total revenue) through October was 17,743 ($211,458) in 2012; 16,968 ($209,427) in 2011; and 16,842 ($201,458) in 2010.

Rolling Hills County Park’s numbers are more complex, because there are two different admission counts and charges: just to use the park; and to use the water park. Attendance at the park (and revenue) was 34,288 ($265,617) in 2012; 34,816 ($266,930) in 2011; and 33,583 ($258,910) in 2010. Attendance at the water park dwarfed that at the rest of the park: 114,522 ($780,122) in 2012; 115,012 ($780,995) in 2011; and 113,635 ($761,453) in 2010. Total revenue at Rolling Hills – which has rental facilities, food concessions, and winter operations exceeding those of the other parks – was $1,317,900 in 2012; $1,310,255 in 2011; and $1,247,549 in 2010.

Recreation Reports: Development Projects

Tetens reported that the spray-and-play zone at Independence Lake is about 80% complete for the building, spray zone, landscaping, and electrical service. TriMedia was hired to update the sewage pump system serving the beach center.

At Rolling Hills, the water park expansion is well underway, with the block structure for the bathhouse building nearly done and underground utility piping and storm water piping complete. The improvement in both parks will be done and ready for opening on Memorial Day 2013. Tetens predicted that 2013 “will be a remarkable year for us,” with these two huge improvements.

At the County Farm Park, paving work and site restoration is nearing completion for the pathway from Washtenaw Avenue to the Platt Road pavilion, creating what Tetens called “a new front door.” He reassured commissioner Fred Veigel that “all the dead trees have been taken out.”

At Sharon Mills Park, replacement of the pedestrian bridge adjacent to the millpond dam with a new, prefab steel truss bridge is in progress.

Recreation Reports: Border-to-Border (B2B) Trail

The Border-to-Border (B2B) Trail continues to be built at Dexter’s River Terrace. The boardwalk sections are nearly finished and asphalt paving is underway. Staff also erected blazes on the B2B in Ann Arbor from Fuller Road to the Argo Cascades.

In Ypsilanti, city staff revised the application to the state DNR to extend the B2B into the Water Street redevelopment area, with WCPARC financial support. That application is under review.

Natural Areas Preservation Program (NAPP) Update

Several updates were given in a written report presented to commissioners.

Acquiring natural areas requires several steps, and after acquisition they must be maintained. To assist acquisition, a baseline environmental assessment was done for the Baker property purchased in Lima Township and sent to the state Dept. of Environmental Quality. WCPARC staff also made site visits to properties under consideration in Manchester, Freedom and Salem townships; and WCPARC forwarded the title search and a revised phase 1 environmental assessment for the Arbor Vistas project to the state DNR.

Staff also received a schedule for constructing a boardwalk in the Draper-Houston preserve; engaged a contractor to build a parking lot and observation decks for the Trinkle Marsh at Easton Farm preserve and another to construct boardwalks and bridges through the wetlands of the Spike Preserve; continued to remove invasive species, especially invasive shrubs, from parks and preserves; and began to develop management plans for Scio Woods and West Lake preserves, as well as a low-impact wayfinding system for all NAPP preserves.

Commission Changes

As business drew to a close, commission member Jimmie Maggard announced, “As of today, this will be my last meeting.” He said he was resigning from the commission after 24 years, and has other projects in the works in Ypsilanti Township.

Jimmie Maggard, Washtenaw County parks & recreation commission, The Ann Arbor Chronicle

Jimmie Maggard at the Nov. 13 meeting of the county parks & recreation commission. (Photo by M. Leary.)

President Bob Marans expressed surprise and said, “I am sorry to see you go, and I appreciate your contributions.” When Fred Veigel proposed that the commission present Maggard with a plaque to commemorate his service, Maggard replied: “I just want my golf course pass.”

Maggard then thanked his colleagues on the commission. “We’ve always been on the same level, always thinking about the citizens, what we can do for them, keeping the parks clean. We’ve had Bob [Tetens] for quite a while now and he’s done a great job.”  Maggard said Tetens was leading them in the right direction. He also praised the transition when Coy Vaughn was promoted to succeed Tom Freeman as deputy director. “I want to thank everybody,” Maggard concluded. “I’ll change my resignation to the end of the year.”

Commission member Barbara Bergman chimed in to say, “The next meeting will be my last. [She did not seek re-election to the county board of commissioners, the reason for her seat on WCPARC.] I hope to remain on the mental health board. Hopefully there will be one slot that the chair can appoint and I hope it will be Janis [Bobrin, who is retiring as county water resources commissioner – position that entitled her to a seat on WCPARC. Evan Pratt, newly elected water resources commissioner, will take that place]. As much as I love WCPARC, this spot belongs to Janis. I haven’t,” she added, “been here long enough to get a cake.”

Present: President Robert Marans, vice president Patricia Scribner, secretary/treasurer Nelson Meade, Jan Anschuetz, Barbara Bergman, Janis Bobrin, Jimmie Maggard, Dan Smith, and Fred Veigel.
Absent: Rolland Sizemore, Jr.

WCPARC staff: Director Robert Tetens, deputy director Coy Vaughn, planner Megan Bonfiglio, and consultant Tom Freeman.

Legal Legacy Land Conservancy: Executive director Susan Lackey and land protection coordinator Robin Burke.

Washtenaw County Parks Commission June 12, 2012

Ann Arbor Chronicle article, focussing on Staebler Farm master plan, about Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission meeting on Tuesday, June 12, 2012.


EMU Regents Change Eagle Crest Management

Article about April 17, 2012 EMU Board of Regents meeting.


EMU Regents change Eagle Crest Management

Ypsilanti city council hears about emergency financial managers

Ypsi city council April 17, 2012

Article about the April 17, 2012 Ypsilanti City Council meeting

Income tax affects EMU staff and students

Income tax affects EMU staff and students

Interest rates on student loans will double